MANUFACTURING CEO CONFIDENCE: 5.5/10 · 1 IN 3 CEOS CITE TARIFFS AS THEIR PRIMARY HEADWIND · THE SILO TAX IS THE ONE COST YOU CONTROL
Questions? Call 877-323-KERN (5376)
CEO BRIEFING FOR COMPLEX MANUFACTURERS
Stop Paying The
Silo FrictionTax
Offset the Costs of Tariffs, Healthcare, Trade Tensions, and Economic Volatility by Recovering The Margin Leaking Between the Silos.
Manufacturing cost lost to cross-silo friction annually
5–20%
ASQ / McKinsey OHI
$48M–$72M
Recoverable margin at $500M revenue
Kern and Partners Field Diagnostics
5.5x
Premium for strongly
aligned manufacturers
Harvard Business Review
8-PAGE CEO BRIEFING COVERS:
-
Why the Silo Friction Tax is not a line item on your P&L and what to do about it.
-
How to estimate the cost of your Silo Tax across your operational areas.
-
Tariffs and healthcare costs offset quantification examples
-
Case studies: Three manufacturers who fixed the friction tax and found new gains.
-
Why your current Ops Improvement programs do not reduce Silo Fiction Tax
-
The neuroscience of silo formation and how to break down silo behaviors.
-
The six operational benefits of Silo Tax Recovery - from Margin to Talent.
-
Access to Complimentary Silo Friction Assessment
ACCESS NOW
Download the briefing:
Stop Paying THE Tax from Silo Friction.
Receive a complimentary Friction Tax Assessment.
Your information is kept strictly confidential. We do not sell or share your data. By submitting you agree to receive the briefing and occasional relevant research from Kern and Partners. Unsubscribe anytime.
$48M–$72M
Conservative recoverable value at $500M in revenue
Kern and Partners
42%
of C-suite leaders say AI increased inter-departmental friction
McKinsey State of AI 2024
87%
of manufacturing CEOs improving operational efficiency right now
Chief Executive Group, Feb 2026
350 hrs
per year, per leader lost to silo firefighting
Kern and Partners Field Diagnostics
INSIDE THE BRIEFING
No fuff. Just Insights. Value on Every Page
SECTION 1
The Costs You Cannot Control. The One You Can.
Pushing against the external headwinds with the internal cost variable leadership directly impacts.
​
SECTION 5
What Senior Leaders Recover When Friction Is Removed
Six recoverable benefit categories. Margin, cash, velocity, reshoring capability, AI returns, and talent retention.
​
SECTION 2
What the Silo Tax Costs You — and What Recovering It Offsets
The five silo tax cost categories quantified at $500M in revenue to offset tariff, healthcare, and reshoring impacts.
​
SECTION 6
The Neuroscience of Why Silo Friction Is Hard to Fix
Why KPI alignment and cascaded goals alone don't actually change the natural, tribal, protectionist behaviors within and across silos—and what does.
SECTION 3
Three Manufacturers Who Reduced Silo Friction Tax
Watts Water, Ford, and Danaher. What they actually did and what it produced. No theory — documented results.
​
SECTION 5
Cross-Silonomics™: Find It, Measure It, Fix It
The three-pillar intervention model of structure, behavior, and governance you can use to find, measure and fix silo friction
​
SECTION 4
Why Improvement Programs Do Not Reduce the Silo Tax
Lean, ERP, S&OP, reshoring, quality systems, working capital programs. What each misses and why the gap compounds.
SECTION 8
Confidential Silo Friction Assessment
The complimentary 45-minute Silo Friction Assessment that converts silo tax suspicions into a company-specific financial picture within 48 hours.
THE EVIDENCE INSIDE
Silo friction reduction doesn't require new customers, new markets, or new capital.
CASE: WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES
+$76M / +5.1 Margin Points
Expanded operating margin by 5.1 points over five years through the One Watts Performance System, a cross-functional discipline built on shared metrics, standardized handoffs, and aligned behaviors. Margin expansion outpaced revenue growth. Named one of America’s Best Midsize Companies 2025 by TIME.
CASE: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
No Bailout. Profitable by 2009.
In 2006, Ford lost $12.7 billion. Alan Mulally’s recovery was built on one structural mechanism: a weekly cross-functional Business Plan Review with defined decision rights and shared data. Ford returned to profitability in 2009 without government assistance.
​
CASE: DANAHER CORPORATION
+10,000% EPS since 1990
Danaher’s three-decade track record traces directly to its cross-functional operating discipline. When shop floor problems traced to other functions — sales, finance, engineering — they fixed the interface. EPS grew roughly 10,000% from 1990 to 2023.
​
Russell M. Kern
FOUNDER & CEO, KERN AND PARTNERS
Author, Transform or Die
40-year CEO of a national agency serving Fortune 500 clients — AAA, AMEX, AT&T, Blue Cross, DirecTV, SAP
Agency acquired by the world’s largest holding company
Creator of the Cross-Silonomics™ methodology
“Most executives we work with are not surprised that silo friction exists. They are surprised by the size of the total when it is added together. And they are surprised to discover that a significant portion is directly recoverable — without new capital, new technology, or additional headcount.”
Russell Kern has spent four decades helping organizations find the performance that is already present in their operations but being suppressed by structural misalignment, human dynamics, and governance gaps. The Cross-Silonomics™ methodology is the systematic result of that work — a discipline for identifying, quantifying, and eliminating cross-silo friction as an economic problem rather than a cultural one.
Collaboration Expert and Human Dynamics Friction Reduction Specialist
Offset the costs of tariffs, healthcare, and uncertainty.
Stop Paying The Silo Friction Tax
The question is only whether you will find it before your competitors find theirs.
Download the briefing now.
© 2026 Kern and Partners · Cross-Silonomics™ is a trademark of Kern and Partners.
877-323-KERN (5376) · www.kernandpartners.com